top of page

Sheltering Walls

Bare Trees in Fog

. . . among the sheep and cows. Sounds a bit drastic like choosing to chuck it all and check into a convent -- or live in an anchorage like Julian of Norwich in the fourteenth century. Drastic or tempting?

 Farmland and wind turbines, St. Patrice de Beaurivage, Quebec, Canada
Farmland and wind turbines, St. Patrice de Beaurivage, Quebec, Canada

If it seems drastic to go low-tech it may be because of how far we have wandered from such a life. The next generation, my grandkids, are yearning to break-up with their endless connections through social media. At one point, the oldest one, about to be twenty-six, stopped every so often to post a "moment in time" from her day. Now, that's drastic!


There are people and places that continue to live a low-tech life either by choice or limited resources. A way of life, is what I am aiming at here. A village of 900 people where my grandparents were born remains low-tech, 100 years after they emigrated to the U.S.

St. Patrice de Beaurivage in Quebec is still agricultural going all the way back to the time when the King of France apportioned plots of land to farm and harvest fresh food -- real maple syrup--- homemade ice cream like you've never tasted even today. It goes beyond the sweets to potatoes to tomatoes to pears and apples.


What appeals most beyond the nutritional benefits is the notion that neighbors call on each other -- know each other -- help each other. Of course, that chance exists for each of us every day. Yet, how are we to form connections beyond the screen?


Some years ago when living in Boston, on the seventh floor from where I looked over the treetops to my neighbor's rooftop garden, I thought, there is no way I will ever learn his name, let alone meet him. I simply called him "the man". Soon enough, a moment came.


In a low-tech encounter the man and other neighbors met when a local developer aspired to build-up above our mutual views. We began to meet in our apartments to share snacks and ideas about the best way to stop the greedy miser who cared not a thing about his neighbors' light.


Over many months there were home gatherings that brought us out of our high-tech lives by organizing ourselves for what would prove to be a long drawn-out battle. The man was no longer someone over there. One day, he was pruning his penthouse roses. I had something to share about an upcoming meeting. I opened my window and hollered: "Call me". He came over with his partner for yet another gathering with neighbors we could now greet by name on the street. It was a drastic change!


If I had my way, I would revert to the days that the upcoming generation seems to be clamoring for--the days when driving in my car (my very low-tech older model) was a place of solitude where nobody could reach me, or find me via a tracking app on the cell phone, and without the intrusion of the "witch in the box" or "homing pigeon" aka the GPS.


Low-tech looks like a walk in the park while my mind roams without roaming charges. Is it possible to go back to "village" life? Or, have we crossed the Rubicon on living free of devices? Another man asked me on a train one day to please watch his "ball and chain" for him. He got it right, if you ask me.


When the day came for the Boston developer to appear before the zoning board, an entourage from the neighborhood outnumbered him and his lawyers. City Hall was abuzz as always. We crowded into the room all together awaiting our turn to speak. We supported one another in making sound arguments that this neighborhood, in particular, was a small, friendly place to live. A high-rise would not only obstruct the view, it would build a wall between neighbors. We failed to convince the city officials that we mattered more than the developer's right to build to the city limits.


A tear trickled down my cheek at what felt like a gut punch. The man said he would take it to court. After a number of months, the verdict came in and the neighborhood gathered to celebrate our victory!


Last weekend I walked down that Boston street. The trees and sunlight were just as I remembered. One of the neighbors we met back then is now living in the old apartment where I lived and had gathered with others for a righteous cause.

Boston's Back Bay Neighborhood
Boston's Back Bay Neighborhood

 Years later, that little neighborhood had another chance to come together with blankets and water when the so-called "Marathon Bombers" set off two bombs at the nearby finish line. The man was a manager at the department store. He aided in the investigation that came down to arrests and imprisonment of the bombers. Later, he told me, that his employees needed psychological counseling after witnessing the tragedy. Meanwhile, on that sunny beautiful Monday, runners ran into neighboring buildings in fear. People poured out of their apartments to wrap them in blankets and give them water.


It was a long while before the neighborhood went back to normal without TV cameras and the National Guard on every corner. I often walked home the long way to avoid the scene. But the real take-away was how neighbors came out that day, the same as they had to stop a developer who did not understand the meaning of "village" life.








 
 
 

Updated: Apr 1

Boston Common No Kings
Boston Common No Kings

These five women holding up the iconic symbol of freedom were most likely unaware when they created their cardboard cutouts that they themselves would become symbolic as "Mothers of Exiles"-- a line in the poem embronzed at the base of the Statue of Liberty.*


A mighty woman with a torch, whose flame

Is the imprisoned lightning, and her name

Mother of Exiles.*


I was among the 180,000 Americans huddled in 30-degree sunshine with my daughter to lift the flame of hope. Decent, everyday people on behalf of others and ourselves came together under the NO KINGS banner joined by ALL Massachusetts elected officials including Senators Markey and Warren. Each spoke forcefully in opposition to the current administration's ruthless policies against immigrants -- against freedoms-- given to each of us. Not to mention, yet again, an unlawful war against another country.



Meanwhile, a thousand miles away in St. Augustine, Florida waving in sunny skies were reminders of how those freedoms were fought for 250 years ago, and continue to be fought for now.

St Augustine, Florida No Kings                           										photo by Thomas Schwartz
St Augustine, Florida No Kings photo by Thomas Schwartz

Those very freedoms were finally claimed for all future generations and Lady Liberty has been holding them in her other hand etched in stone forevermore.





 
 
 

That's what we all are with one exception--those in the midst of war, once again.


Last summer in a French study program in my grandparents' homeland of Quebec, I was accused of being a pacifist. I had no problem with this, but Frankie did. "You probably come from one of those liberal places like, Massachusetts". Bingo! Frankie grew up in Texas. He was a recently discharged ex-army guy who had served in Iraq. What had he seen and heard there in the midst of a hot war? He was not an innocent bystander, but he was a witness to see, hear, or know by personal presence and perception. God knows what that meant for a young, nearly seven-foot-tall man who stood straight with shoulders back. Frankie carried a leather journal, like mine. This was our connecting point.


He favord the "Beat" poets and writers of the days when I was coming of age. I told him Jack Kerouac and I grew up in the same place--were both French Canadians having gone to Catholic schools. "Have you ever gone to his grave"?, he asked in a tone belying his persona. "Oui", (as we were having this conversation in French). I recounted seeing packs of cigarettes, beer bottles with flowers, and, of course, poetry written by other beatnik fans. I said "I think Jack would have identified as a pacifist, preferring poetry to violence". Frankie nodded, "Peut'etre", (Maybe).


Frankie made head's turn--those of the fifteen-year-old's in the class--those who had left San Salvador alone to escape violence and brutal regimes--those who knew about oppression. Frankie might have seemed a hero, a savior, if you will in their eyes. His thirty-year-old counterparts knew better, seeing beyond the facade. Those women did not let him get away with his sexist remarks and blatant misogyny.


Frankie for all his bravado was a wanderer with a journal that in his quiet moments might have said no to war with his pen, making him a pacifist the principled opposition to war and violence as a means of settling disputes ... Peut'etre.


Now, like the rest of us, he is a witness to war without his weapon. I wonder if he is waving the flag (like some) or writing with his pen, or both, depending on who he is talking to. The key word in the definition of pacifist is principled: acting in accordance with morality and showing recognition of right and wrong. I would add recognition of truth and lies.




 
 
 
bottom of page